BrandVantage
Structured data for Market Research, Link Previewing, Competitor Analysis, Machine Learning, SEO Analysis, Price Comparison and Product Development
BrandVantage turns web pages into structured data, simplifying your data gathering process so you can focus on what's important.
Get started with BrandVantage{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "WebPage",
"name": [
"These streamliners are the world�s most aerodynamic cars | Ars Technica",
"These streamliners are the world�s most aerodynamic cars"
],
"description": "Inspired by VW's ARVW concept, we look at the cars with tiny drag coefficients.",
"alternateName": "Ars Technica",
"url": "https://arstechnica.com/cars/2020/05/teardrops-and-wind-tunnels-a-look-at-the-worlds-most-aerodynamic-cars/",
"headline": "These streamliners are the world�s most aerodynamic cars",
"mainEntity": [
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"description": "Inspired by VW's ARVW concept, we look at the cars with tiny drag coefficients.",
"author": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Jonathan M. Gitlin",
"url": "https://arstechnica.com/author/jonathan-m-gitlin/"
},
"creator": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Person",
"name": "Jonathan M. Gitlin",
"url": "https://arstechnica.com/author/jonathan-m-gitlin/"
},
"headline": "These streamliners are the world�s most aerodynamic cars",
"articleBody": "<p>With no car launches to work on thanks to COVID-19, some automakers' press offices are filling the gap by digging into the archives to share interesting stuff with the rest of us. On Thursday, Volkswagen North America reached out to tell us about the company's most aerodynamic car ever. It was called the Aerodynamic Research Volkswagen, and it was built in 1980 as a demonstration of how to make a vehicle as slippery as possible, with a drag coefficient (Cd) of just 0.15. Powered by a 177hp (132kW) 2.4L inline-six cylinder engine, the ARVW reached a speed of 225mph (362km/h) at the Nardo test track in southern Italy. But the ARVW isn't the lowest-drag vehicle ever built, just the lowest-drag VW. So what is the most aerodynamic car of all time?</p> <h2>Production cars</h2> <p>When Tesla revealed its <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/03/the-tesla-model-3-reviewed-finally/\">Model 3 sedan</a> a few years ago, it was justifiably proud of the car's Cd of 0.23, which bettered the Models S and X by 0.01. Tesla didn't optimize the Model 3's aerodynamics just for bragging rights. The lower a car's drag, the farther it can go per unit of energy because it doesn't have to work as hard to push its way through the air. However, a Model 3 is only this slippery through the air when the car's 18-inch wheels are fitted with the aero wheel covers, something <a href=\"https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a30169467/tesla-model-3s-aero-wheel-covers-efficiency-test/\">Car and Driver put to the test late last year</a>. (If you're a Model 3 owner and into hypermiling, you can cut your car's drag�and thereby boost its range�even further by <a href=\"https://unpluggedperformance.com/aerodynamic-study-of-tesla-model-3/\">fitting aftermarket front- and rear spoilers</a>.)</p> <h3>Further Reading</h3><a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/09/the-porsche-taycan-every-bit-as-good-as-a-200000-porsche-should-be/\">The Porsche Taycan�every bit as good as a $200,000 Porsche should be</a>But the Model 3 isn't the lowest-drag car to have gone into production. <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/09/the-porsche-taycan-every-bit-as-good-as-a-200000-porsche-should-be/\">Porsche's Taycan battery EV</a> bested Tesla's best when it went on sale last year. Both the Taycan Turbo and Taycan 4S manage a Cd of 0.22, although again, only with the most aerodynamic wheels fitted. The Taycan Turbo S uses a different design, and in the wind tunnel, that adds 0.03 to the Cd. <p>That number is pretty low, and it's one reason <a href=\"https://www.autoblog.com/2020/04/22/2020-porsche-taycan-4s-first-drive/\">Autoblog</a>, <a href=\"https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a30874032/porsche-taycan-range-test-tesla-model-s/\">Car and Driver</a>, <a href=\"https://www.thedrive.com/new-cars/32868/how-i-got-295-miles-of-range-out-of-the-porsche-taycan-turbo\">The Drive</a>, <a href=\"https://insideevs.com/reviews/395038/porsche-taycan-road-trip-240-mile-range/\">Inside EVs</a>, <a href=\"https://www.motortrend.com/cars/porsche/taycan/2020/2020-porsche-taycan-real-world-range-test/\">MotorTrend</a>, <a href=\"https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/a32207936/i-beat-the-porsche-taycan-4ss-epa-range-by-81-miles/\">Road and Track</a>, <a href=\"https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/features/2020-porsche-taycan-ev-range-test/\">Roadshow</a>, and others have all found its EPA range is woefully pessimistic. But Porsche wasn't the first automaker to sell a car with a Cd of just 0.22. Both BMW and Mercedes-Benz got there first, each with a diesel sedan. In 2013, Mercedes optimized the already slippery 2013 CLA�Cd 0.23�a little further for the CLA 180 BlueEfficiency, fitting different mirrors, wheel covers, serrated spoilers, and a few other tweaks here and there to reach a Cd of 0.22. Four years later, BMW got the same number for its 520d EfficientDynamics diesel sedan.</p> <h2>What about frontal area?</h2>You will have noticed that I've only listed the Cd figure for each of these cars, but the aerodynamicists out there will rightly point out that a car's drag coefficient isn't actually as important as its drag area, or CdA. This is the number you get when you multiply its Cd by the frontal area of the car, but it's also a number that OEMs and designers rarely release. So we've gone with just the Cds for now.But we're not done yet. Way back in 1996, General Motors' late <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car%3F\">lamented EV1 BEV</a> cut through the air with a Cd of just 0.19. That was equalled in 2013 when VW�building on the lessons it learned with the ARVW�brought out the XL1. This two-seater was built at the behest of <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/08/ferdinand-piech-dies-father-of-the-porsche-917-and-bugatti-veyron/\">Ferdinand Piech</a>, who told VW's engineers he wanted a \"1 liter car\" able to travel 100km on just 1L, which works out to 235.1mpg if you speak American. In fact, the XL1, a plug-in hybrid that combined a 47hp (45kW) two-cylinder diesel engine and 27hp (20kW) electric motor was able to better Piech's target, achieving 0.89L/100km (265mpg) on the European test cycle. <p>The XL1 might not hold the crown for the lowest-drag production car for too much longer. Over in the Netherlands, a startup called Lightyear is developing a solar EV called the Lightyear One. If it manages to make it into production, it should equal or better the EV1 and XL1�for now, Lightyear is just claiming a Cd of \"<a href=\"https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xKy6IOJM-SBOOHbN8hT8d0iLKm3s568Z\">below 0.2</a>.\"</p> <h2>Concepts and racers</h2> <p>A Cd of 0.19 is indeed slippery, but as the ARVW shows, if you don't need to meet any road car homologation rules, it's possible to cut drag even further. Like the JCB Dieselmax: in 2006, this diesel-powered land speed record car was designed by Ron Ayers, also responsible for the Thrust 2, <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/10/breaking-the-sound-barrier-by-air-by-land-and-in-free-fall/\">Thrust SSC</a>, and <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/11/bloodhound-ssc/\">Bloodhound SSC</a> (now <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/07/bloodhound-lsr-the-1000mph-car-starts-high-speed-tests-in-october/\">Bloodhound LSR</a>) land speed cars. (Also, the Enfield 8000, which was turned into <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/12/on-the-road-in-the-flux-capacitor-europes-fastest-street-legal-ev/\">Jonny Smith's Flux Capacitor</a>.) The JCB Dieselmax wasn't as fast as the jet-powered land speed cars driven by RAF Wing Commander Andy Green, but it did set a world record for diesel-powered vehicles, reaching 350mph (563km/h). Its Cd? 0.147.</p> <p>In the realm of pure concept cars, Ford's Probe V of 1986 might be the most aerodynamic ever created. As the name suggests, it was the fifth in <a href=\"https://www.hemmings.com/stories/2020/02/27/did-the-series-of-ford-probe-concept-cars-go-on-to-influence-the-production-ford-probe\">a series of Probe concepts</a> dating back to the late 1970s. The engine was mounted at the rear, which allowed for a very low hood, and all four wheels were covered with fairings, which meant when tested in the wind tunnel, the Probe V recorded a Cd of only 0.137.</p> <p>There are even more slippery cars out there, though. Although these days <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/09/how-a-day-driving-high-downforce-cars-at-vir-taught-me-im-ok-being-slow/\">race cars are optimized to create downforce</a>, before aerodynamicists worked out that the air could be harnessed for added grip, their efforts were mainly focused on drag reduction. This was particularly true at Le Mans, where the track included the three-mile (4.8km) Mulsanne straight. No Le Mans car appears to have taken this more seriously than the Panhard CD LM64. Its bodywork was the result of aerodynamicists Charles Deutsch and Lucien Romani, and it used covered wheels and a smooth underfloor to race down the Mulsanne straight with a Cd of 0.12</p> <p>Even the Panhard is bettered, however, by another land speed car called Goldenrod. Built by brothers Bob and Bill Summers, in 1965 it set a world record for the fastest wheel-driven car on earth, at 409mph (659km/h). That record stood until 1991 and was down to a combination of four Chrysler Hemi engines and a Caltech-honed shape with a Cd of 0.1165.</p> <p>But the record for the lowest-drag wheeled vehicle of all time goes to a much stranger looking machine than any of the others featured in the gallery above. It's called the Eco-Runner 8, and it's one of a series of cars built by Team Delft for the Shell Eco-marathon. With a recumbent driving position and just three wheels, Eco-Runner 8's torpedo-like body is probably the most aerodynamically efficient road vehicle ever, with a scarcely believable Cd of 0.045.</p> <p><em>Listing image by Volkswagen</em></p>"
},
{
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "Article",
"name": "These streamliners are the world�s most aerodynamic cars",
"description": "Inspired by VW's ARVW concept, we look at the cars with tiny drag coefficients.",
"image": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "ImageObject",
"url": "https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/The_ARVW-11578-760x380.jpg"
}
}
],
"text": "<p>With no car launches to work on thanks to COVID-19, some automakers' press offices are filling the gap by digging into the archives to share interesting stuff with the rest of us. On Thursday, Volkswagen North America reached out to tell us about the company's most aerodynamic car ever. It was called the Aerodynamic Research Volkswagen, and it was built in 1980 as a demonstration of how to make a vehicle as slippery as possible, with a drag coefficient (Cd) of just 0.15. Powered by a 177hp (132kW) 2.4L inline-six cylinder engine, the ARVW reached a speed of 225mph (362km/h) at the Nardo test track in southern Italy. But the ARVW isn't the lowest-drag vehicle ever built, just the lowest-drag VW. So what is the most aerodynamic car of all time?</p> <h2>Production cars</h2> <p>When Tesla revealed its <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/03/the-tesla-model-3-reviewed-finally/\">Model 3 sedan</a> a few years ago, it was justifiably proud of the car's Cd of 0.23, which bettered the Models S and X by 0.01. Tesla didn't optimize the Model 3's aerodynamics just for bragging rights. The lower a car's drag, the farther it can go per unit of energy because it doesn't have to work as hard to push its way through the air. However, a Model 3 is only this slippery through the air when the car's 18-inch wheels are fitted with the aero wheel covers, something <a href=\"https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a30169467/tesla-model-3s-aero-wheel-covers-efficiency-test/\">Car and Driver put to the test late last year</a>. (If you're a Model 3 owner and into hypermiling, you can cut your car's drag�and thereby boost its range�even further by <a href=\"https://unpluggedperformance.com/aerodynamic-study-of-tesla-model-3/\">fitting aftermarket front- and rear spoilers</a>.)</p> <h3>Further Reading</h3><a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/09/the-porsche-taycan-every-bit-as-good-as-a-200000-porsche-should-be/\">The Porsche Taycan�every bit as good as a $200,000 Porsche should be</a>But the Model 3 isn't the lowest-drag car to have gone into production. <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/09/the-porsche-taycan-every-bit-as-good-as-a-200000-porsche-should-be/\">Porsche's Taycan battery EV</a> bested Tesla's best when it went on sale last year. Both the Taycan Turbo and Taycan 4S manage a Cd of 0.22, although again, only with the most aerodynamic wheels fitted. The Taycan Turbo S uses a different design, and in the wind tunnel, that adds 0.03 to the Cd. <p>That number is pretty low, and it's one reason <a href=\"https://www.autoblog.com/2020/04/22/2020-porsche-taycan-4s-first-drive/\">Autoblog</a>, <a href=\"https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/a30874032/porsche-taycan-range-test-tesla-model-s/\">Car and Driver</a>, <a href=\"https://www.thedrive.com/new-cars/32868/how-i-got-295-miles-of-range-out-of-the-porsche-taycan-turbo\">The Drive</a>, <a href=\"https://insideevs.com/reviews/395038/porsche-taycan-road-trip-240-mile-range/\">Inside EVs</a>, <a href=\"https://www.motortrend.com/cars/porsche/taycan/2020/2020-porsche-taycan-real-world-range-test/\">MotorTrend</a>, <a href=\"https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/a32207936/i-beat-the-porsche-taycan-4ss-epa-range-by-81-miles/\">Road and Track</a>, <a href=\"https://www.cnet.com/roadshow/features/2020-porsche-taycan-ev-range-test/\">Roadshow</a>, and others have all found its EPA range is woefully pessimistic. But Porsche wasn't the first automaker to sell a car with a Cd of just 0.22. Both BMW and Mercedes-Benz got there first, each with a diesel sedan. In 2013, Mercedes optimized the already slippery 2013 CLA�Cd 0.23�a little further for the CLA 180 BlueEfficiency, fitting different mirrors, wheel covers, serrated spoilers, and a few other tweaks here and there to reach a Cd of 0.22. Four years later, BMW got the same number for its 520d EfficientDynamics diesel sedan.</p> <h2>What about frontal area?</h2>You will have noticed that I've only listed the Cd figure for each of these cars, but the aerodynamicists out there will rightly point out that a car's drag coefficient isn't actually as important as its drag area, or CdA. This is the number you get when you multiply its Cd by the frontal area of the car, but it's also a number that OEMs and designers rarely release. So we've gone with just the Cds for now.But we're not done yet. Way back in 1996, General Motors' late <a href=\"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who_Killed_the_Electric_Car%3F\">lamented EV1 BEV</a> cut through the air with a Cd of just 0.19. That was equalled in 2013 when VW�building on the lessons it learned with the ARVW�brought out the XL1. This two-seater was built at the behest of <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/08/ferdinand-piech-dies-father-of-the-porsche-917-and-bugatti-veyron/\">Ferdinand Piech</a>, who told VW's engineers he wanted a \"1 liter car\" able to travel 100km on just 1L, which works out to 235.1mpg if you speak American. In fact, the XL1, a plug-in hybrid that combined a 47hp (45kW) two-cylinder diesel engine and 27hp (20kW) electric motor was able to better Piech's target, achieving 0.89L/100km (265mpg) on the European test cycle. <p>The XL1 might not hold the crown for the lowest-drag production car for too much longer. Over in the Netherlands, a startup called Lightyear is developing a solar EV called the Lightyear One. If it manages to make it into production, it should equal or better the EV1 and XL1�for now, Lightyear is just claiming a Cd of \"<a href=\"https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1xKy6IOJM-SBOOHbN8hT8d0iLKm3s568Z\">below 0.2</a>.\"</p> <h2>Concepts and racers</h2> <p>A Cd of 0.19 is indeed slippery, but as the ARVW shows, if you don't need to meet any road car homologation rules, it's possible to cut drag even further. Like the JCB Dieselmax: in 2006, this diesel-powered land speed record car was designed by Ron Ayers, also responsible for the Thrust 2, <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/10/breaking-the-sound-barrier-by-air-by-land-and-in-free-fall/\">Thrust SSC</a>, and <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/11/bloodhound-ssc/\">Bloodhound SSC</a> (now <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2019/07/bloodhound-lsr-the-1000mph-car-starts-high-speed-tests-in-october/\">Bloodhound LSR</a>) land speed cars. (Also, the Enfield 8000, which was turned into <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2015/12/on-the-road-in-the-flux-capacitor-europes-fastest-street-legal-ev/\">Jonny Smith's Flux Capacitor</a>.) The JCB Dieselmax wasn't as fast as the jet-powered land speed cars driven by RAF Wing Commander Andy Green, but it did set a world record for diesel-powered vehicles, reaching 350mph (563km/h). Its Cd? 0.147.</p> <p>In the realm of pure concept cars, Ford's Probe V of 1986 might be the most aerodynamic ever created. As the name suggests, it was the fifth in <a href=\"https://www.hemmings.com/stories/2020/02/27/did-the-series-of-ford-probe-concept-cars-go-on-to-influence-the-production-ford-probe\">a series of Probe concepts</a> dating back to the late 1970s. The engine was mounted at the rear, which allowed for a very low hood, and all four wheels were covered with fairings, which meant when tested in the wind tunnel, the Probe V recorded a Cd of only 0.137.</p> <p>There are even more slippery cars out there, though. Although these days <a href=\"https://arstechnica.com/cars/2018/09/how-a-day-driving-high-downforce-cars-at-vir-taught-me-im-ok-being-slow/\">race cars are optimized to create downforce</a>, before aerodynamicists worked out that the air could be harnessed for added grip, their efforts were mainly focused on drag reduction. This was particularly true at Le Mans, where the track included the three-mile (4.8km) Mulsanne straight. No Le Mans car appears to have taken this more seriously than the Panhard CD LM64. Its bodywork was the result of aerodynamicists Charles Deutsch and Lucien Romani, and it used covered wheels and a smooth underfloor to race down the Mulsanne straight with a Cd of 0.12</p> <p>Even the Panhard is bettered, however, by another land speed car called Goldenrod. Built by brothers Bob and Bill Summers, in 1965 it set a world record for the fastest wheel-driven car on earth, at 409mph (659km/h). That record stood until 1991 and was down to a combination of four Chrysler Hemi engines and a Caltech-honed shape with a Cd of 0.1165.</p> <p>But the record for the lowest-drag wheeled vehicle of all time goes to a much stranger looking machine than any of the others featured in the gallery above. It's called the Eco-Runner 8, and it's one of a series of cars built by Team Delft for the Shell Eco-marathon. With a recumbent driving position and just three wheels, Eco-Runner 8's torpedo-like body is probably the most aerodynamically efficient road vehicle ever, with a scarcely believable Cd of 0.045.</p> <p><em>Listing image by Volkswagen</em></p>",
"mainContentOfPage": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "WebPageElement",
"cssSelector": "#main>article>div:nth-child(1)>div:nth-child(1)>section>div"
}
}
Lifting usable data off of the page
One of the biggest difficulties with data gathering across the internet is the inconsistency of websites. How each website is built can vary wildly from one site to the next.
BrandVantage takes the hard work out of this with our proprietary system that can identify specific types of content from many methods, combining the result into a cohesive structure.
Rather than needing to deal with HTML, we provide data back to you in JSON format following the Schema.org vocabulary.
Learn more about our Web Page APIPowering your ideas with data
-
Generating link previews?
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPage", "name": [ "Your First Year in Code - A complete guide for new & aspiring developers | Product Hunt", " Your First Year in Code - A complete guide for new & aspiring developers | Product Hunt" ], "description": "Starting a career in programming can be intimidating. Your First Year in Code can help, with practical advice on topics like code reviews, resume writing, fitting in, ethics, and finding your dream job. leanpub.com/firstyearincode", "alternateName": "Product Hunt", "image": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://ph-files.imgix.net/56cc11f3-4f22-49d2-be2a-517bd1f97e67?auto=format&fit=crop&frame=1&h=512&w=1024" }, "url": "https://www.producthunt.com/posts/your-first-year-in-code", "headline": " Your First Year in Code - A complete guide for new & aspiring developers | Product Hunt", "text": "Starting a career in programming can be intimidating. Your First Year in Code can help, with practical advice on topics like code reviews, resume writing, fitting in, ethics, and finding your dream job. leanpub.com/firstyearincode", "mainContentOfPage": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPageElement", "cssSelector": "#__next>main>div:nth-child(2)>div>section>div>div:nth-child(2)>div>div>div" } } -
Checking news articles?
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPage", "name": "Smartphone shipments jumped 26% in Q1 � only to recapture ground lost to the pandemic � The Register", "url": "https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/08/smartphone_q1_shipments/", "mainEntity": [ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "NewsArticle", "image": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://regmedia.co.uk/2016/08/22/shutterstock_food_snappers.jpg", "height": 428, "width": 648 }, "author": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "Matthew Hughes" }, "dateModified": "2021-06-09", "datePublished": "2021-06-08", "headline": "Smartphone shipments jumped 26% in Q1 � only to recapture ground lost to the pandemic", "publisher": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "name": "The Register", "url": "https://www.theregister.com/", "logo": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://www.theregister.com/design_picker/1fea2ae01c5036112a295123c3cc9c56eb28836a/graphics/std/red_logo_sans_strapline.png", "height": 55, "width": 330 } } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "name": "Smartphone shipments jumped 26% in Q1 � only to recapture ground lost to the pandemic", "description": "Don't call it growth", "image": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://regmedia.co.uk/2016/08/22/shutterstock_food_snappers.jpg" } } ], "text": "<p>Global smartphone shipments recovered in the first quarter of this year following a dismal 2020 for the mobile hardware industry.</p> <p>Shipments grew by 26 per cent to nearly 388 million, according to analyst Gartner, compared to just 300 million during the first quarter of 2020.</p> <p>But look closer at the numbers, and a slightly different picture starts to emerge. Speaking to <em>The Register</em>, Gartner analyst Anshul Gupta warned against considering this bump as \"growth\" but rather a recovery from an unprecedented year for the mobile industry, bolstered by the gradual introduction of 5G services.</p> <p>\"Some of this growth was related to the reopening of economies and people having more disposable income to spend on non-essential goods. There was a huge pent-up demand,\" he explained.</p> <p>\"Some of the markets we follow � the UK, France, Germany � are looking really strong [compared] to what we've seen. We should be seeing some positive growth in these markets this year. And some of that growth can be attributed to the rollout of 5G networks,\" he added.</p> <p>This recovery was not evenly distributed. The top-five vendors � Samsung, Apple, Xiaomi, Vivo, and OPPO � all recorded growth in terms of absolute shipment units, as well as their share of the market. But the \"Others\" category, which includes smaller vendors (and, for the first time in years, Huawei), contracted by almost a third, with its market share plummeting from 42.6 per cent to 30.9 per cent.</p> <p>One factor driving this trend was the continuing difficulties in the supply chain, particularly when it comes to semiconductor components. Whereas the likes of Apple can easily secure production time at TSMC's foundries, smaller vendors lacking the same purchasing power were forced to wait in line.</p> <ul><li><a href=\"https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/08/operation_ironside_anom/\">Australian cops, FBI created backdoored chat app, told crims it was secure � then snooped on 9,000 users' plots</a></li><li><a href=\"https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/07/apple_college_student_photo_leak/\">Apple settles with student after authorized repair workers leaked her naked pics to her Facebook page</a></li><li><a href=\"https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/04/lg_open_sources_fosslight/\">LG opens open-source licence compliance tool source</a></li><li><a href=\"https://www.theregister.com/2021/06/03/huawei_harmonyos_2/\">Huawei names first tablets, phones to run its Android-in-disguise HarmonyOS 2</a></li></ul> <p>\"When it comes to large players, they have the capacities to really secure these [semiconductor] shipments. When it comes to smaller companies, they really struggle,\" Gupta explained.</p> <p>\"Because of that, the larger players can make their supply appear more stable and ensure device launches happen on time, while keeping inventory available in the market. Smaller players haven't been able to do that, and they suffer from a lack of access to telecoms companies. Given that, the market has really shifted towards four or five players, and they are taking up a larger share of the market.\"</p> <p>But that doesn't necessarily mean that larger firms aren't feeling the pinch, albeit to a lesser degree. \"Everyone is talking about having a very tight supply, and the situation continues to be really challenging,\" he said.</p> <p>Another point that may play a factor in the shrinking of the \"Others\" category in these markets is a fallback in numbers for both Huawei and LG; the latter <a href=\"https://www.theregister.com/2021/04/05/lg_electronics_mobile/\">announced it would withdraw from the smartphone market</a> earlier this year.</p> <p>\"LG had almost 70 to 80 per cent of its market share coming from Latin America and the North American market,\" Gupta said.</p> <p>Samsung clinched the top spot for Q1 2021, delivering 76.7 million shipments and capturing a 20.3 per cent market share. Running up, Apple accounted for 58.5 million of the total shipments, with a 15.5 per cent market share.</p> <p>Occupying the third-place spot once held by Huawei was Xiaomi, with 48.9 million units and a 12.9 per cent market share. Vivo and OPPO came fourth and fifth respectively, both taking a 10.2 per cent market share with shipments of 38.7 million and 38.3 million units apiece. �</p>", "mainContentOfPage": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPageElement", "cssSelector": "#body" } } -
Comparing prices?
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPage", "name": "AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 3.5 GHz Socket AM4 100-100000051WOF Desktop Processor - Newegg.com", "description": [ "Buy AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core 3.5 GHz Socket AM4 105W 100-100000051WOF Desktop Processor with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Newegg shopping upgraded �", "Buy AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core 3.5 GHz Socket AM4 105W 100-100000051WOF Desktop Processor with fast shipping and top-rated customer service. Once you know, you Newegg&#33;" ], "image": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://c1.neweggimages.com/ProductImage/19-113-616-V07.jpg" }, "url": "https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-3950x/p/N82E16819113616", "keywords": [ "Newegg", "Newegg.com", "AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core 3.5 GHz Socket AM4 105W 100-100000051WOF Desktop Processor" ], "mainEntity": { "@context": "http://schema.org/", "@type": "Product", "name": "AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core 3.5 GHz Socket AM4 105W 100-100000051WOF Desktop Processor", "description": "AMD Ryzen 9 3950X 16-Core 3.5 GHz Socket AM4 105W 100-100000051WOF Desktop Processor", "image": "https://c1.neweggimages.com/ProductImage/19-113-616-V07.jpg", "aggregateRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "AggregateRating", "ratingValue": 5.0, "reviewCount": 184 }, "gtin12": "730143311809", "mpn": "100-100000051WOF", "offers": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Offer", "url": "https://www.newegg.com/amd-ryzen-9-3950x/p/N82E16819113616", "availability": "https://schema.org/InStock", "price": "904.99", "priceCurrency": "USD" }, "review": [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "The best 2019 has to offer", "description": "Pros: You know what you're fantasizing about when you're on this page. It's every bit as good as you're imagining it is. 16 cores and almost hilarious performance (in the best way) given its pricing (AND performance!) vs Intel's offerings. Cons: Literally none. This thing is a godsend in processor form. Overall Review: After over a decade I'm happy to be back with Team Red/AMD once again. Consider getting RAM with speed higher than the CPU supports (along with the best timings you can afford) to get the most bang for your buck. \n\nAfter overclocking my RAM (and only my RAM) slightly, I'm getting a 1372 single core and a 15342 multi core result on Geekbench 5. This thing is BEAST. If you can find one, you won't regret it.", "datePublished": "2019-12-21", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "The New Performance King", "description": "Pros: This Processor is spectacular in every way possible. Intel just can't compete right now outside of gaming and even in gaming the margins they win by isn't compelling enough to sacrifice performance in every other aspect.\n\nThank you AMD, great work \n\nGoodbye Intel... Cons: Absolutely nothing Overall Review: Great for Video editing, Games and 3D productivity. Highly recommended.", "datePublished": "2020-01-15", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "Beyond amazing", "description": "Pros: - I was able to drop this CPU into my existing x370 gigabyte k7 motherboard (after BIOS updates)\n- Performance is truly exceptional Cons: - You will need a serious cooling solution such as a Noctua D15 (minimum), or really good AIO liquid cooler (better), or a proper custom loop solution (best). Do some research before purchasing a cooler. Overall Review: At this point you have already read the hardware reviews and benchmark results. Here is my story. \n\nI built a Ryzen 1800X gaming PC using a Gigabyte X370 motherboard about a year ago. The build sheet is listed at the bottom. It was amazing. When Gigabyte released an X370 BIOS supporting the 3950X, my PC hardware junkie inner self couldn't resist ordering one of the fastest (the fastest?) processors ever produced. I updated the BIOS and then I dropped this CPU in my existing PC. It was really easy. I hope this helps.\n\nGigabyte AX370 K7\nGSKILL DDR4 3200 CL14 32GB\nVega 64 LCS\nCorsair HX1200\nCooler Master HAF\nCustom liquid cooling loop (Koolance EXOS 2.5 / CPU-390)", "datePublished": "2020-04-30", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "This is insane", "description": "Pros: Rendering times are crazy faster than I�ve ever seen. What use to take 20 minutes now takes 5 minutes. Crushes photoshop and premiere pro like it was nothing. Cinebench R20 is 9200 and 525 at stock. And still plays games like a champ. Never had temps go over 70c\nI�ve never been happier with a chip. Cons: None. Overall Review: Such wow", "datePublished": "2020-05-29", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "As of this writing, this is still the most powerful consumer grade cpu", "description": " Overall Review: My first AMD cpu in my life, I'm happy AMD finally give me a chance to own one and it certainly didn't disappoint.", "datePublished": "2020-05-19", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "I thought I was a power user.", "description": " Overall Review: I really thought I was a power user, I'm a gamer and sometimes I stream. Barely push the cpu to 20 percent. Stays at 40C or less while im playing/streaming control. Im blown away with the power of this cpu.", "datePublished": "2020-01-29", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "Incredible CPU!", "description": "Pros: 16C / 32T. Mic drop. Cons: At present, it's a bit of a budget buster. Overall Review: No problems as a drop-in upgrade into my existing MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon. I did require the latest BIOS update, of course. However, after updating my BIOS it was a simple, drop-in upgrade that I've been super pleased with since. Nice to see AMD on top again these days.", "datePublished": "2020-03-26", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "Love the power", "description": "Pros: Purchased this to replace my fx8320 cpu ( 4core 8thread ) setup. Cons: Didn�t get the new ryzen logo sticker to replace my fx one.. Overall Review: So had it up and running for like 4 hours and man on stock setting i Maxed it out at 79%usage and running at 4.0ghz I not even tried to over lock yet lol watch out I going to to hopefully load my BattleTech game fast and smooth", "datePublished": "2020-01-21", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "5", "ratingValue": "5", "worstRating": "1" } } ], "sku": "N82E16819113616" }, "breadcrumb": { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ListItem", "item": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Thing", "@id": "https://www.newegg.com/", "name": "Home" }, "position": 1 }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ListItem", "item": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Thing", "@id": "https://www.newegg.com/Components/Store/ID-1", "name": "Components" }, "position": 2 }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ListItem", "item": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Thing", "@id": "https://www.newegg.com/CPUs-Processors/Category/ID-34?Tid=6676", "name": "CPUs / Processors" }, "position": 3 }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ListItem", "item": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Thing", "@id": "https://www.newegg.com/Processors-Desktops/SubCategory/ID-343?Tid=7671", "name": "Processors - Desktops" }, "position": 4 }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ListItem", "item": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Thing", "@id": "https://www.newegg.com/AMD-Processors-Desktops/BrandSubCat/ID-1028-343", "name": "AMD" }, "position": 5 } ] }, "mainContentOfPage": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPageElement", "cssSelector": "#app>div:nth-child(3)>div:nth-child(1)>div>div>div:nth-child(2)>div:nth-child(1)>div:nth-child(5)>div:nth-child(5)>ul" } } -
Looking up reviews?
{ "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPage", "name": "The Rock (1996) - IMDb", "description": "Directed by Michael Bay. With Sean Connery, Nicolas Cage, Ed Harris, John Spencer. A mild-mannered chemist and an ex-con must lead the counterstrike when a rogue group of military men, led by a renegade general, threaten a nerve gas attack from Alcatraz against San Francisco.", "alternateName": "IMDb", "url": "https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/", "aggregateRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "AggregateRating", "bestRating": "10", "ratingValue": "7.4" }, "keywords": [ "Reviews", "Showtimes", "DVDs", "Photos", "Message Boards", "User Ratings", "Synopsis", "Trailers", "Credits" ], "mainEntity": [ { "@context": "http://schema.org", "@type": "Movie", "name": "The Rock", "description": "The Rock is a movie starring Sean Connery, Nicolas Cage, and Ed Harris. A mild-mannered chemist and an ex-con must lead the counterstrike when a rogue group of military men, led by a renegade general, threaten a nerve gas attack...", "image": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZDJjOTE0N2EtMmRlZS00NzU0LWE0ZWQtM2Q3MWMxNjcwZjBhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDk3NzU2MTQ@._V1_.jpg", "url": "/title/tt0117500/", "aggregateRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "AggregateRating", "bestRating": "10.0", "ratingValue": "7.4", "worstRating": "1.0", "ratingCount": 318900 }, "contentRating": "R", "creator": [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "url": "/company/co0076240/" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Organization", "url": "/company/co0102770/" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "David Weisberg", "url": "/name/nm0918711/" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "Douglas Cook", "url": "/name/nm0177018/" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "Mark Rosner", "url": "/name/nm0743119/" } ], "datePublished": "1996-06-07", "genre": [ "Action", "Adventure", "Thriller" ], "keywords": "two word title,time bomb,colored smoke,aircraft,warplane", "review": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Review", "name": "With enough energy to generate an entire city, The Rock will absolutely blow you back into the 90s.", "author": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "diac228" }, "dateCreated": "2008-07-11", "inLanguage": "English", "itemReviewed": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "CreativeWork", "url": "/title/tt0117500/" }, "reviewBody": "The 90s was home to a slew of great raw, uncut, action flicks that shot straight for the rated \"R,\" despite the guarantee that it would make less money than the money-friendly PG-13 rating. While Die Hard and Lethal Weapon may have jump-started this craze, the peak of this was during the next decade, when we saw the likes of Terminator 2, Speed, Face-Off, Con Air, Die Hard: With a Vengeance, The Matrix, Bad Boys, Point Break, Under Siege, True Lies, Desperado, among others (Quite a list I accumulated, eh?). The 90s was certainly a good decade for action fans, but few movies of this genre can quite top the powerful, gripping, and edge-of-your seat action blockbuster The Rock. The name alone sounds powerful, and behind it is two hours of incredible special effects, superb acting, great action set pieces, and good dosage of writing, and Michael Bay on top of his game.\n\nFew action movies carries as much morality and questionable circumstances as this one. In The Rock we follow a furious general (Ed Harris) leading a group of Marines to take control of Alcatraz Island (along with tourist hostages), a location that used to house criminals. Accompanying them are over a dozen missiles that can spell tens of thousands of innocent lives with every blast. However, he isn't just a trigger-happy man gone crazy, he is a man seeking justice for the dozens of lives he saw taken from warfare without compensation. A villain with a \"moral\" agenda, yikes. The only hope for the United States is the only man that has ever broken out of that prison (Sean Connery) and a chemical \"superfreak\" (Nicholas Cage). With the odds obviously against them, the Pentagon is one order away from destroying the entire location regardless of the innocent lives located in the island. Mindless this movie is not, as the stakes are high, there is always a risk of an innocent life going under, and our heroes rarely ever have the scenario under control. It's just enough to make you squeal in frustration.\n\nWith the tension remaining edgy and the solution never being oh-so-close, we can thank the writers for delivering a slam-bang storyline full of great one-liners, likable characters, and a villain that isn't as simple to figure out as the average evildoer. The writing staff ranges from the writer of the third Die Hard to even Tarantino. A major reason for the film's quality is the casting. Sean Connery and Ed Harris are excellent in their roles and Nicholas Cage albeit a few lines does a good job. The supporting staff helps as well, as we see the likes of David Morse, John Spencer, and Cage's love interest Vanessa Marcil.\n\nUnlike Michael Bay's latest films, which run from mediocre to just plain bad, he blends plenty of drama and suspense along with action here. As a matter of fact, the first half of the movie is all suspense, as the situation is developed, and the risks are presented. Disregarding a superb car chase, there isn't much exploding in the first 80 minutes. However, once the protagonists enter the Rock, it all goes on the uphill action swing. We get brutal fights, brutal shootouts, near-misses, double-crosses, triple-crosses, chases, and enough explosions for action fans to sink their teeth into. The funny thing, the two main actors at the time weren't expected to be in such action. Connery was aging, and Nicholas Cage just didn't have the look or the attitude for it. Fortunately for us, they proved us dead wrong.\n\nBottom Line: If you want to see a true action classic, The Rock is a great example. Rising above the average action movie and above the decent ones as well, this is by far Michael Bay's best work and one of the signature flicks of the 90s. Combining tension you can cut with a steak knife with thrills, chills, and plenty of carnage, The Rock has aged well and continues to influence the work of modern action movies and the work of Michael Bay as well. Grab some popcorn and enjoy this ruthlessly clever movie. Recommend to the max, as long as you don't mind a bit of blood spewing onto the screen. They just don't make em' like they used to.", "reviewRating": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Rating", "bestRating": "10", "ratingValue": "9", "worstRating": "1" } }, "actor": [ { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "Sean Connery", "url": "/name/nm0000125/" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "Nicolas Cage", "url": "/name/nm0000115/" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "Ed Harris", "url": "/name/nm0000438/" }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "John Spencer", "url": "/name/nm0817983/" } ], "director": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Person", "name": "Michael Bay", "url": "/name/nm0000881/" }, "duration": "PT2H16M", "trailer": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "VideoObject", "name": "Official Trailer", "thumbnailUrl": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNWQ3YTI5MTItYmY1My00MjBjLWExN2EtZGVlNDVmN2IxZWMxXkEyXkFqcGdeQWdhbWF6b2E@._V1_.jpg", "embedUrl": "/video/imdb/vi2429731097", "uploadDate": "2020-10-31", "thumbnail": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "contentUrl": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BNWQ3YTI5MTItYmY1My00MjBjLWExN2EtZGVlNDVmN2IxZWMxXkEyXkFqcGdeQWdhbWF6b2E@._V1_.jpg" } } }, { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Movie", "name": "The Rock (1996) - IMDb", "description": "Directed by Michael Bay. With Sean Connery, Nicolas Cage, Ed Harris, John Spencer. A mild-mannered chemist and an ex-con must lead the counterstrike when a rogue group of military men, led by a renegade general, threaten a nerve gas attack from Alcatraz against San Francisco.", "image": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZDJjOTE0N2EtMmRlZS00NzU0LWE0ZWQtM2Q3MWMxNjcwZjBhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDk3NzU2MTQ@._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg" } } ], "text": "The 90s was home to a slew of great raw, uncut, action flicks that shot straight for the rated \"R,\" despite the guarantee that it would make less money than the money-friendly PG-13 rating. While Die Hard and Lethal Weapon may have jump-started this craze, the peak of this was during the next decade, when we saw the likes of Terminator 2, Speed, Face-Off, Con Air, Die Hard: With a Vengeance, The Matrix, Bad Boys, Point Break, Under Siege, True Lies, Desperado, among others (Quite a list I accumulated, eh?). The 90s was certainly a good decade for action fans, but few movies of this genre can quite top the powerful, gripping, and edge-of-your seat action blockbuster The Rock. The name alone sounds powerful, and behind it is two hours of incredible special effects, superb acting, great action set pieces, and good dosage of writing, and Michael Bay on top of his game.Few action movies carries as much morality and questionable circumstances as this one. In The Rock we follow a furious general (Ed Harris) leading a group of Marines to take control of Alcatraz Island (along with tourist hostages), a location that used to house criminals. Accompanying them are over a dozen missiles that can spell tens of thousands of innocent lives with every blast. However, he isn't just a trigger-happy man gone crazy, he is a man seeking justice for the dozens of lives he saw taken from warfare without compensation. A villain with a \"moral\" agenda, yikes. The only hope for the United States is the only man that has ever broken out of that prison (Sean Connery) and a chemical \"superfreak\" (Nicholas Cage). With the odds obviously against them, the Pentagon is one order away from destroying the entire location regardless of the innocent lives located in the island. Mindless this movie is not, as the stakes are high, there is always a risk of an innocent life going under, and our heroes rarely ever have the scenario under control. It's just enough to make you squeal in frustration.With the tension remaining edgy and the solution never being oh-so-close, we can thank the writers for delivering a slam-bang storyline full of great one-liners, likable characters, and a villain that isn't as simple to figure out as the average evildoer. The writing staff ranges from the writer of the third Die Hard to even Tarantino. A major reason for the film's quality is the casting. Sean Connery and Ed Harris are excellent in their roles and Nicholas Cage albeit a few lines does a good job. The supporting staff helps as well, as we see the likes of David Morse, John Spencer, and Cage's love interest Vanessa Marcil.Unlike Michael Bay's latest films, which run from mediocre to just plain bad, he blends plenty of drama and suspense along with action here. As a matter of fact, the first half of the movie is all suspense, as the situation is developed, and the risks are presented. Disregarding a superb car chase, there isn't much exploding in the first 80 minutes. However, once the protagonists enter the Rock, it all goes on the uphill action swing. We get brutal fights, brutal shootouts, near-misses, double-crosses, triple-crosses, chases, and enough explosions for action fans to sink their teeth into. The funny thing, the two main actors at the time weren't expected to be in such action. Connery was aging, and Nicholas Cage just didn't have the look or the attitude for it. Fortunately for us, they proved us dead wrong.Bottom Line: If you want to see a true action classic, The Rock is a great example. Rising above the average action movie and above the decent ones as well, this is by far Michael Bay's best work and one of the signature flicks of the 90s. Combining tension you can cut with a steak knife with thrills, chills, and plenty of carnage, The Rock has aged well and continues to influence the work of modern action movies and the work of Michael Bay as well. Grab some popcorn and enjoy this ruthlessly clever movie. Recommend to the max, as long as you don't mind a bit of blood spewing onto the screen. They just don't make em' like they used to.", "mainContentOfPage": { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "WebPageElement", "cssSelector": "#titleUserReviewsTeaser>div>span:nth-child(2)>div:nth-child(3)>p" } }
Ready to get started?
Start powering your business, ideas and products with BrandVantage.
Get started with BrandVantage Contact sales